Tennessee Heartwood
  • Welcome
  • Resources
    • Research and Studies
    • "Restoration" Logging at Hogback: The Monitoring Continues >
      • maps and data
    • timber sale monitoring in the cherokee
    • Research Opportunities: Smith Mountain Burn Exclusion Area
    • Legal Stuff
    • Getting Involved. >
      • National Forest Project Timeline Checklist >
        • Example Timber Sale
    • Freedom of Information Act
  • About
  • Contact
  • The Latest
    • The Land Between the Lakes Tornado Salvage
    • Support the Land Between the Lakes
    • Restoration, Regeneration, and Resiliency: A Look at Three National Forest Management Strategies
    • Public Rights on our National Forests Under Attack >
      • Citizens Losing Voice on the Future of Our Federal Lands >
        • Getting Shut Out
        • the case for a public voice in our national forests
        • regular folks making a difference
        • National Forest Economics
        • wild alabama
        • rally for our rights
        • LBL Activism
        • Digging Deeper on the New National Forest Rule
        • The Three "R's"
    • Our New Interpretive Trail Signs Are Up at Stringer's Ridge
    • "Restoration" Logging at Hogback: The Monitoring Continues
    • The American Chestnut: Advocacy and Treasure Hunting
    • Land Between the Lakes
    • Smith Mountain Timber Sale Cancelled!
    • Riverbend
    • Prentice Cooper
    • Dinkey Sale
    • "Climate Change Resiliency"-the LBL's New Pine Project
  • Store
  • join us
  • Accomplishments
    • 2022 Accomplishments
    • 2021 Accomplishments
    • 2020 Accomplishments
    • 2019 Accomplishments
    • 2018 accomplishments
    • 2016 accomplishments
    • 2015 Accomplishments
    • 2014 Accomplishments
    • 2013 Accomplishments
  • Symposium Series
  • outings
    • Spring Wildflower Hike in the Citico Creek Wilderness
    • Hike to Foster Falls
    • Botanic Hike with Jay Clark at Pigeon Mountain
  • a summer of workshops
  • Smith Mountain Timber Sale Cancelled!
  • Events & Outings
  • Tennessee State Forests
  • Bridgestone Wilderness
  • bridgestone/firestone keeping promise
  • Open Habitats
  • Take Action on Bridgestone Wilderness
  • old growth forests
  • Support the Land Between the Lakes
  • pond mountain
  • Pond Mountain
  • Forest Service Announces "Climate Focused" Policy:
  • Fire in the East

Environmental Economics and Public Oversight of Our National Forests

For decades, both Congressional and independent research has shown that the National Forest timber program loses money.  Beyond the rote dollars and cents of sale receipts and subsidies lies other costs to the taxpayer and the health of the forest. Environmental economics and citizen oversight is an underrated part of public participation in National Forest Management.​

In the 1990's the Congress' Government Accountability Office (GAO) tried to research the Forest Service's Timber, finding some glaring inefficiencies, such as a backlog of thousands of miles of roads that are mostly subsidized logging road infrastructure. Ultimately, it found that after extensive research, that the agency's accounting system was obscure and deceptive to the point of being unaccountable.

A new report by the Center for Sustainable Economy, has found that the agency loses up to 2 billion dollars a year due to subsidies and other factors that distort timber markets and contributes to an overall loss of forest biodiversity and productivity. 

Key findings of the report include:
  • Federal forestlands are far more valuable when managed for carbon and other ecosystem services yet logging on these lands continues to be subsidized.
  • Taxpayers subsidies for the federal logging program ranged from $1.6 to $1.8 billion per year in fiscal years 2013 through 2017. The estimated losses are conservative as they do not include logging related damages to water, soils, wildlife and other resources.
  • The Forest Service attempts to justify these losses by hiding commercial timber sale projects within larger ecological restoration projects – a move that consistently lands the agency in court.
  • Selling timber from federal lands below cost is a form of environmentally harmful subsidy that runs afoul of international agreements.
The enormous volume of forest roads that are subsidized for the timber industry is another underappreciated taxpayer expense. The new NEPA rule potential to have a huge effect on both the economic health of our National Forest system.  For decades, the Forest Service had acknowledged billions of dollars of backlog in its enormous road system. The Roads Rule of 2000 was designed to reduce road volumes, which would reduce budgetary problems and the ecological effects of poorly maintained roads.  This rule essentially makes the Roads Rule dead in the water- the agency has reversed course on their policy of needing to reduce road volumes and now claim they need more, allowing up to 5.5 miles of road on a project without providing any rationale.  The Roads Rule was meant to reform its thousands of miles of road backlog, reduce the obvious harmful effects of road volumes, and reduce the sheer budget crisis that came from being unable to maintain such a large system. In the interests of saving taxpayer dollars alone, this needs to be addressed.

Indeed, citizen watchdog groups have found that "creative accounting" conceals effects to the land that are not often accounted at all.  Members of Tennessee Heartwood found through field work and use of internal agency documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act that that the Forest Service had to spend over $100,000 to mitigate a single site at a disastrous timber sale (the Hogback/Island Creek sale)  in the Cherokee National Forest that had eroded to the point of being unable to regenerate itself.  This information was important in building a case for the agency to not repeat its actions in future projects.  As a result, the agency wisely withdrew two timber sales, the Stone Pile sale, and the Dinkey sale, and rewrote them in a way that took into account the likely risks that logging on sites simliar to those at Hogback would incur- including costs to the taxpayer to mitigate logging on sensitive sites. This would not have happened if there had been no meaningful public comment rights for citizens.

Picture
This wasn't figured into the cost of the timber sale:  erosion at the Cherokee National Forest, and over 100 grand in mitigation later
Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly